In the world of music, ownership of songs and the rights to the masters is a topic that often sparks heated debates. Recently, DJ Maphorisa made a bold claim that any song recorded in his studio or with his tools belongs to him.
This statement caused quite a stir, with many people, including the controversial Nota Baloyi, agreeing with his stance. However, one artist who wasn’t afraid to challenge this claim was Prince Kaybee.
During an Instagram live chat, DJ Maphorisa asserted his belief that owning the masters of songs recorded in his studio was his right. He argued that the use of his tools and space entitled him to full ownership.
ALSO ON TSZ MZANSI: Vusi Nova Is Dropping A New Reality Show Titled, “Vusi Nova Unprovoked”
This claim quickly gained traction and became a trending topic, causing a divide among music industry insiders and fans.
Prince Kaybee, who has had a history of disagreements with DJ Maphorisa, took to Twitter to express his disagreement with this claim. In a witty and sarcastic tone, he questioned the logic behind Maphorisa’s argument.
“Growing up, I’ve changed my beliefs. I now believe that working together on creative projects is about sharing intellectual property. So, someone must write a song, produce a beat, and craft it, and you own everything just because you bought Nando’s and lights?” Prince Kaybee tweeted.
This response from Prince Kaybee showcased his belief in collaboration and the importance of recognizing the contributions of all parties involved in the creation of a song. He emphasized the need for a fair and equitable distribution of ownership and rights.
However, a Twitter user attempted to challenge Prince Kaybee’s stance by bringing up the TNS saga. TNS had previously accused Prince Kaybee of similar claims regarding song ownership.
But Prince Kaybee swiftly shut down this argument, stating, “I don’t think he can attest to any of those accusations. He owns all he did, you’re welcome to ask him.”
This response highlighted Prince Kaybee’s confidence in his own actions and ownership of his work. It also showcased his willingness to address any allegations made against him directly.
